Re: Fundamental flaws

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SOFTWAREMARKET WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by John_Fufel on September 22, 19103 at 07:34:40:

In Reply to: Re: Fundamental flaws posted by . on March 19, 19102 at 20:42:56:

: : : : :
:
Akron dsl ---- Albany dsl ---- Albuquerque dsl ---- Alexandria dsl ---- Allentown dsl ---- Amarillo dsl ---- Anaheim dsl ---- Anchorage dsl ---- Ann-Arbor dsl ---- Arlington CDP dsl ---- Arlington dsl ---- Atlanta dsl ---- Aurora dsl ---- Austin dsl ---- Bakersfield dsl ---- Baltimore dsl ---- Baton-Rouge dsl ---- Beaumont dsl ---- Berkeley dsl ---- Birmingham dsl ---- Boise dsl ---- Boston dsl ---- Bridgeport dsl ---- Buffalo dsl ---- Cedar-Rapids dsl ---- Charlotte dsl ---- Chattanooga dsl ---- Chesapeake dsl ---- Chicago dsl ---- Chula-Vista dsl ---- Cincinnati dsl ---- Citrus Heights CDP dsl ---- Cleveland dsl ---- Colorado-Springs dsl ---- Columbus dsl ---- Columbus dsl ---- Concord dsl ---- Corpus Christi dsl ---- Dallas dsl ---- Dayton dsl ---- Denver dsl ---- Des-Moines dsl ---- Detroit dsl ---- Durham dsl ---- East Los Angeles CDP dsl ---- El-Monte dsl ---- El Paso dsl ---- Elizabeth dsl ---- Erie dsl ---- Escondido dsl ---- Eugene dsl ---- Evansville dsl ---- Flint dsl ---- Fort-Lauderdale dsl ---- Fort Wayne dsl ---- Fort Worth dsl ---- Fremont dsl ---- Fresno dsl ---- Fullerton dsl ---- Garden Grove dsl ---- Garland dsl ---- Gary dsl ---- Glendale dsl ---- Glendale dsl ---- Grand Rapids dsl ---- Greensboro dsl ---- Hampton dsl ---- Hartford dsl ---- Hayward dsl ---- Hialeah dsl ---- Hollywood dsl ---- Honolulu-CDP dsl ---- Houston dsl ---- Huntington Beach dsl ---- Huntsville dsl ---- Independence dsl ---- Indianapolis-(remainder) dsl ---- Inglewood dsl ---- Irvine dsl ---- Irving dsl ---- Jackson dsl ---- Jacksonville dsl ---- Jersey dsl ---- Kansas dsl ---- Kansas dsl ---- Knoxville dsl ---- Lakewood dsl ---- Lansing dsl ---- Laredo dsl ---- Las-Vegas dsl ---- Lexington Fayette dsl ---- Lincoln dsl ---- Little Rock dsl ---- Livonia dsl ---- Long-Beach dsl ---- Los Angeles dsl ---- Louisville dsl ---- Lowell dsl ---- Lubbock dsl ---- Macon dsl ---- Madison dsl ---- Memphis dsl ---- Mesa dsl ---- Mesquite dsl ---- Metairie CDP dsl ---- Miami dsl ---- Milwaukee dsl ---- Minneapolis dsl ---- Mobile dsl ---- Modesto dsl ---- Montgomery dsl ---- Moreno-Valley dsl ---- Nashville dsl ---- New Haven dsl ---- New-Orleans dsl ---- New York dsl ---- Newark dsl ---- Newport-News dsl ---- Norfolk dsl ---- Oakland dsl ---- Oceanside dsl ---- Oklahoma dsl ---- Omaha dsl ---- Ontario dsl ---- Orange dsl ---- Orlando dsl ---- Overland-Park dsl ---- Oxnard dsl ---- Paradise-CDP dsl ---- Pasadena dsl ---- Paterson dsl ---- Peoria dsl ---- Philadelphia dsl ---- Phoenix dsl ---- Pittsburgh dsl ---- Plano dsl ---- Pomona dsl ---- Portland dsl ---- Portsmouth dsl ---- Providence dsl ---- Raleigh dsl ---- Rancho Cucamonga dsl ---- Reno dsl ---- Richmond dsl ---- Riverside dsl ---- Rochester dsl ---- Rockford dsl ---- Sacramento dsl ---- Salem dsl ---- Salinas dsl ---- Salt Lake dsl ---- San Antonio dsl ---- San Bernardino dsl ---- San-Diego dsl ---- San-Francisco dsl ---- San-Jose dsl ---- Santa Ana dsl ---- Santa Clarita dsl ---- Santa Rosa dsl ---- Savannah dsl ---- Scottsdale dsl ---- Seattle dsl ---- Shreveport dsl ---- Simi Valley dsl ---- Sioux-Falls dsl ---- South-Bend dsl ---- Spokane dsl ---- Springfield dsl ---- Stamford dsl ---- Sterling Heights dsl ---- Stockton dsl ---- St.-Louis dsl ---- St. Paul dsl ---- St. Petersburg dsl ---- Sunnyvale dsl ---- Syracuse dsl ---- Tacoma dsl ---- Tallahassee dsl ---- Tampa dsl ---- Tempe dsl ---- Thousand Oaks dsl ---- Toledo dsl ---- Topeka dsl ---- Torrance dsl ---- Tucson dsl ---- Tulsa dsl ---- Vallejo dsl ---- Virginia Beach dsl ---- Waco dsl ---- Warren dsl ---- Washington dsl ---- Waterbury dsl ---- Wichita dsl ---- Winston-Salem dsl ---- Worcester dsl ---- Yonkers dsl ----
em number 1 - control over the target machine, the machine I install : : the software on, cannot be guaranteed. If I can download the software, : : then I can copy the software and run it in a protected environment. I can : : figure out how it works. And, typically after a short period of time, I : : can crack the copy/distribution protection on it. The software can now : : be distributed for zero cost to anyone I wish, and I can resell the now : : unneeded liscense to gain back my original investment. : : Not only has this been proven true for software, but for general content : : as well: MP3's, DVD data, encrypted web filter lists, the list goes on. : : Once the data is on my machine, all bets about duplication are off. : : : : Problem number 2 - people don't want to have big brother watching over : : thier shoulder. This is one of the reasons DIVX failed so miserably: I : : certainly don't want my vcr calling up the manufacturer every month to ask : : for permission to stay powered on. Businesses are not going to deal with : : this either. Suppose multiple bootleg copies of your liscense start : : popping up all over the place - which ones does the broker grant keys to? : : Which ones are legal? Who does the broker ask? And will the infobroker : : decide, in thier position of significant power, to just disable all copies : : since piracy is obviously happening? How would you feel if your business : : could be deprived of critical software because one of your disgruntled : : employees took a copy of the software with him when returning to india? : : This would be a _significant_ risk to a business, especially a small one. : : : : Problem number 3 - this relates specifically to software, not content in : : general: open source software advances as fast as commercial software, if : : not faster. Not only does it advance with time, but it is also cheaper : : and support is absolutely guaranteed, for all time. Expandability is : : also guaranteed, because you can hire from a base of workers to maintain : : and add any flexibility to require. : : If a proprietary company goes belly up, the outstanding liscenses suddenly : : become worthless. Suddenly the support infrastructure has vanished, and : : you can't do anything about it. While you may continue to use your : : software for as long as you like, it will depreciate faster than a new car : : and very quickly will not be up to the task. : : You could argue that source code could be made available with the liscense, : : but this would only serve to increase the speed at which open source : : products duplicate the functionality. And if a liscensee were to make : : modifications to source anyway, the changes might as well be submitted to : : an open source clone that does not require liscensing fees. : : : : In short, while an interesting concept, I see no way that this could be a : : viable option without forcing users to give up ownership of thier computer : : systems. There is no way to prevent infinite data copying and breaking of : : the encryption schemes; there is no way to guarantee that the durable good : : cannot be counterfeited or copied an infinite number of times. And there : : is also the problem of maintenance when a company dies, and the currently : : undecided question of whether commercial software can even compete with : : the large scale open source movements currently underway. : : It made me think, but I wouldn't give it much of a chance of being viable. : : -dennis towne

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SOFTWAREMARKET WWWBoard ] [ FAQ ]